1.Overview
Review Tables support team-based review with quality assurance and approval workflows, enabling firms to manage large document review projects with defined roles, staged review processes, and measurable quality standards.
2.Reviewer Assignment and Role Definition
1. Reviewer Role
Team members assigned to review and extract data from documents.
2. Quality Assurance Role
Senior attorneys review reviewer work for accuracy.
3. Project Manager Role
Overall project coordination and timeline management.
4. Approver Role
Final approval authority for review results.
3.Review Workflow Stages
Stage 1: Initial Review
- Assigned reviewers review documents and populate review table data
- Reviewers enter findings, risk assessments, and recommendations
- System tracks review progress and completion percentage
Stage 2: Quality Assurance Review
- QA reviewers examine sample of completed reviews (typically 10–20% of documents)
- QA reviewers verify accuracy of extracted data and appropriateness of risk classifications
- QA reviewers provide feedback on review quality
Stage 3: Correction and Re-Review
- Based on QA feedback, reviewers correct identified inaccuracies
- Documents requiring re-review are re-queued for QA
- Process continues until quality standards are met
Stage 4: Final Approval
- Project manager or partner reviews completed reviews
- Addresses any flagged items or exceptions
- Approves review table for delivery to client or use in transaction
4.Quality Assurance Metrics
The system tracks quality metrics enabling continuous improvement:
- Accuracy Rate: Percentage of reviewed documents passing QA review without corrections
- Rework Rate: Percentage of documents requiring re-review after initial completion
- Consistency Rate: Variation in risk classifications across reviewers (identifies reviewers with different risk tolerance)
- Timeliness: Percentage of reviews completed within target timeline
5.Review Table Reporting
Review Tables generate multiple report formats:
1. Summary Report
Executive summary of review findings: total documents reviewed, high-risk documents identified, material contracts requiring attention, and recommended actions and priorities.
2. Detailed Review Table
Export of review table for further analysis. All extracted data in spreadsheet format enables sorting and filtering by any column, and pivot analysis (e.g., "count of contracts by risk level").
3. Risk Summary
Consolidated view of identified risks: list of all identified risks sorted by severity, recommended mitigation actions, and priority ordering for attention.
4. Action Item List
Extracted list of recommended actions: required third-party consents, contracts requiring renegotiation, regulatory compliance items, and financial impacts or obligations.
Frequently asked questions
A Review Table is a spreadsheet-like interface where each row represents a document and columns contain extracted or analyzed data about that document. Review Tables support due diligence, discovery, compliance review, and contract management projects.
Ask Sque can analyze entire document collections simultaneously—classifying document types, extracting key data elements (parties, dates, obligations, financial terms), performing custom domain-specific analysis, and flagging high-risk documents. Extracted data automatically populates Review Table columns.
Yes. Review Tables support team-based review with defined roles (Reviewer, Quality Assurance, Project Manager, Approver), staged workflows, QA sampling, and tracked quality metrics including accuracy rate, rework rate, and timeliness.
Review Tables generate summary reports, detailed spreadsheet exports, risk summaries sorted by severity, and action item lists including required consents, renegotiation items, and compliance obligations.